The event is over. The tables are being cleared, the lights are going out, and everyone is tired but satisfied. And then? At most organizations, silence follows. Maybe a brief review at the next meeting. “It was a success” or “let’s do it differently next time.” But no one knows exactly what worked and what didn’t.
That’s a shame. Because evaluating an event isn’t something you do after the fact. It starts before the event, when you set your goals. Without a clear goal, there’s no benchmark. Without a benchmark, there’s no evaluation—and therefore no improvement.
Ask yourself three questions before you start planning: How do we want participants to feel afterward? What do we want them to know? And what do we want them to do? Those three questions are your yardstick. Use them to evaluate all the data and feedback you receive after the event.
You measure a kick-off event aimed at “getting employees excited about the new strategy” differently than a conference aimed at “establishing thought leadership in the market.” With the kick-off, you want to know whether people understand the strategy and support it. With the conference, you want to know whether attendees associate your brand with expertise.
Those goals don’t have to be complicated. But they do need to be written down. Because when you ask afterward, “Was it a success?”, you want to be able to say more than just “the atmosphere was good.” You want to say: “85 percent of participants say they understand the new strategy, compared to 40 percent before the event.”
That is evaluation. Not a feeling, but a fact.
